The backlash comes after several other recent posts involving Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet also sparked debate online.
Now, the latest image has reignited the long-running argument.
Meghan has faced backlash over her children before
Meghan and Prince Harry have always been protective of their children, Archie and Lilibet.
Since stepping back from royal duties in 2020 and relocating to California, the couple have largely kept their family life private.
Their children are rarely photographed publicly, and when Meghan does share glimpses of them, their faces are usually hidden or only partly visible.
However, that approach has not stopped criticism.
In recent months, Meghan has posted several rare family moments, including images for Archie’s birthday and Easter weekend.
One birthday post showed a young Archie asleep on Prince Harry’s chest as a baby, while another image showed him on the beach with his younger sister, Lilibet.
Meghan wrote: “7 years later… happy birthday to our sweet boy.”
While many fans found the post touching, others criticized the fact that the children’s faces were not clearly shown.
One person commented: “As ever, both faceless phantoms.”
Others questioned whether the images were edited, while some accused Meghan of sharing just enough to keep public interest alive without fully showing the children.
The Easter post caused a similar reaction.
In that update, Archie and Lilibet were seen enjoying an egg hunt, decorating eggs, and spending time outside at the family’s Montecito home.
Again, many supporters described the images as sweet and age-appropriate.
But critics accused Meghan of using carefully curated family moments while still claiming to value privacy.
Online safety has become a major cause for the Sussexes
The controversy is especially sensitive because online safety has become one of Meghan and Harry’s most prominent causes.
The couple has repeatedly warned about the dangers of social media, cyberbullying, digital exploitation, and harmful online content.
Meghan has also spoken personally about her own experience with online abuse.
During an appearance on the Teenager Therapy podcast, she said: “I don’t care if you’re 15 or you’re 25, if people are saying things about you that aren’t true, what that does to your mental and emotional health is so damaging.”
She also said: “We all know what it feels like to have our feelings hurt.”
In the couple’s Netflix docuseries Harry & Meghan, Meghan became emotional as she discussed threats she had seen online.
“I think for people to really understand, you know, when you plant a seed that is so hateful, what it can grow into,” she said.
She also claimed that guidance from the couple’s security team included examples of violent online threats.
Meghan said one message read: “Meghan just needs to die. Someone needs to kill her. Maybe it should be me.”
Because of that history, supporters argue Meghan is uniquely qualified to discuss online harm and its real-life consequences.
But critics argue that her decision to keep posting carefully framed images of her own children muddies the message.
That debate became louder after Meghan traveled to Geneva for a major global event focused on protecting children from online harm.
Meghan delivered a speech at a child safety memorial
Meghan recently attended the opening of the Lost Screen Memorial in Geneva, Switzerland, during World Health Assembly week, Bored Panda reports.
The memorial, created with the involvement of Archewell Philanthropies and The Parents’ Network, honored children and young people who lost their lives after experiencing digital harm, including cyberbullying, grooming, sextortion, and exposure to harmful online content.
The installation featured 50 illuminated lightboxes designed to resemble smartphones, each displaying the lock screen image of a child remembered by their grieving family.
Meghan appeared alongside World Health Organization Director-General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus and met with bereaved parents and campaigners.
During her speech, the Duchess said children’s safety online should be treated as a public health issue.
She told attendees: “Our children are not products, they are not experiments and not expendable.”
Meghan also urged governments, technology companies, and families to take stronger action to protect young people online.
She said: “Children today are being shaped by systems designed to capture attention at any cost: relentless algorithms, exploitative engagement, and endless exposure to harmful content that they are not seeking out.”
The Duchess added: “But these outcomes are not inevitable, and prevention begins with one simple principle: children must be safe by design, not safe by chance.”
At the event, Meghan reportedly hugged grieving parents and laid a flower at the memorial.
Supporters praised the speech as emotional and powerful, while others said it was important to see a high-profile figure pushing for stronger online protections.
But the timing of one Instagram photo caused the entire trip to become controversial.
Critics accused Meghan of hypocrisy
Hours before her Geneva appearance, Meghan shared a mirror selfie from what appeared to be her walk-in closet.
The image showed Meghan getting ready for the trip while Princess Lilibet sat on the floor nearby.
The four-year-old was seen helping with her mother’s shoes, though her face was not visible.
Meghan captioned the post: ‘Mama’s little helper’ with a purple heart emoji.
At first, many royal fans described the photo as adorable.
Some praised the rare glimpse into Meghan’s home life, while others focused on Lilibet’s auburn hair and the sweet mother-daughter moment.
People later reported that Meghan wore a lilac dress during her Geneva trip that had been chosen by Lilibet, adding a sentimental detail to the outfit.
InStyle also noted that the dress had appeared in the earlier Instagram image with Lilibet, connecting the family moment to Meghan’s public appearance.
However, the criticism came quickly.
Some social media users argued that sharing any image of Lilibet before a speech about child safety online felt contradictory.
“This is disgusting,” one person wrote.
Another wrote: “Don’t use your kids on social media, then go and give a speech about the dangers of social media for children.”
A third said: “This is awful. They’re such hypocrites.”
Others accused Meghan of using her daughter to promote her public image while speaking about protecting children from digital exposure.
Royal commentator Tom Sykes was among the critics, arguing that not showing Lilibet’s face did not fully remove privacy concerns.
He wrote that hiding a child’s face can still create curiosity, because the child becomes part of a public narrative even without being fully visible.
He also criticized the closet setting, claiming the image placed luxury clothing and Meghan’s private lifestyle alongside a humanitarian campaign in a way he considered tone-deaf.
Supporters said the criticism went too far
Despite the backlash, many people defended Meghan.
Supporters argued there is a clear difference between a parent sharing a carefully controlled photo of their own child and children being targeted by harmful algorithms, online predators, cyberbullying, or exploitative platforms.
One person wrote online: “Pretty stupid if people can not see the difference between a child’s pic not showing her face and the ongoing manipulation the digital world uses that endangers children.”
Others said Meghan was simply sharing a harmless family moment and had deliberately protected Lilibet’s privacy by ensuring her face could not be seen.
A supporter added: “I love how she can take great photos without exposing her children’s faces. So she is still documenting their lives, but she’s not exposing them too much.”
Another wrote: “What an adorable little family.”
Some fans also pointed out that Meghan is frequently criticized no matter what she does.
When she does not share her children, critics accuse her of hiding them. When she does share glimpses, critics accuse her of exploiting them.
That contradiction has become a recurring theme in debates surrounding the Sussex family.
For supporters, the closet photo was not evidence of hypocrisy but proof that Meghan is trying to strike a balance between being a public figure and protecting her children.
The new closet photo sparked fury
The image that sparked the latest outrage was the closet selfie showing Princess Lilibet sitting on the floor beside Meghan’s wardrobe, per the Mirror.
In the photo, Meghan could be seen standing in front of a mirror while preparing for her Geneva trip.
Lilibet sat nearby, handling her mother’s shoes as rows of clothing and heels surrounded them.
Her auburn hair was visible, but her face was turned away from the camera.
Meghan captioned the image: ‘Mama’s little helper.’
Critics quickly seized on the timing, arguing that the post was inappropriate because it came shortly before Meghan spoke publicly about protecting children online.
Some described the image as ‘hypocritical,’ while others called it ‘tone-deaf.’
One critic said the issue was not simply whether Lilibet’s face could be seen, but whether a four-year-old could meaningfully consent to becoming part of a public social media conversation.
Others questioned the luxury closet backdrop, arguing it distracted from the seriousness of Meghan’s humanitarian work in Geneva.
Supporters, however, insisted the backlash was exaggerated.
They argued that the photo did not expose Lilibet’s identity in any meaningful way and that Meghan had every right to share a carefully framed family moment.
The debate has since continued across social media, with some calling the post sweet and others branding it ‘disgusting.’